Your AI code shipped fast.
Your security didn't.

Series A diligence, enterprise customers, or compliance deadlines are forcing questions your team can't answer yet.

We step in, stabilize the risk, and leave you audit-ready โ€” in two weeks.

Trusted by technical teams at European SaaS companies

๐Ÿ”’ SOC 2 Type II โœ“ ISO 27001 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ GDPR-aligned

The gap between shipping speed and security readiness

Due Diligence Pressure

Investors are asking security questions you can't confidently answer โ€” yet.

Enterprise Customers

Security reviews are slowing deals your product already won.

Compliance Deadlines

Audits are scheduled. Documentation doesn't exist.

Every week this remains unresolved increases external scrutiny โ€” and reduces your room to maneuver.

A two-week intervention that closes the gap

1
Week 1: Exposure Mapping

We determine what is actually in production and what would fail external scrutiny. Code paths. AI-generated logic. Infrastructure. Access. Logging. Evidence gaps.

2
Week 2: Stabilization

We neutralize material risks and produce documentation you can stand behind. Fixes deployed. Controls clarified. Evidence assembled.

You don't leave with findings.
You leave with answers.

Choose your intervention

Efficiency Entry

Platform Reliability Sprint

Fixed scope ยท 2 weeks

A focused intervention to remove deployment bottlenecks, stabilize infrastructure, and restore engineering velocity.

Used when shipping friction is the dominant constraint โ€” often before or alongside security work.

Learn More
Continuation

Ongoing Platform & AI Security Pod

Monthly engagement

An embedded team that maintains stability, security, and audit readiness as AI-assisted development continues.

Used after stabilization, when teams decide not to return to reactive fixes.

Learn More

Built by operators who've seen this pattern before

We've spent years inside growing SaaS companies โ€” through early scale, external audits, and investor scrutiny.

Long enough to know the difference between what looks secure, and what actually holds up when someone external starts asking questions.

We've seen strong teams ship quickly, adopt AI tooling, and unknowingly create gaps that only surface under pressure โ€” diligence, enterprise security reviews, or compliance deadlines.

What this experience translates to

Not a framework checklist.
Not a tool rollout.
Not a long engagement.

A short, decisive window where risk is surfaced, material issues are addressed, and documentation reflects reality.

That's the only thing that matters when timing is tight.

Why this is intentionally narrow

We don't try to solve every security problem.

We focus on the ones that become visible externally โ€” and the narrow window where teams still have control over the outcome.

How this engagement works

  • Fixed scope
  • Fixed timeline
  • Senior-led delivery
  • No long-term commitment required
This engagement exists to compress uncertainty โ€” not to create dependency.
If it's not the right intervention, we'll say so early.

Questions from technical leaders

How long does the intervention take? +
Two calendar weeks from kickoff to delivery.
What if more work is needed afterward? +
We'll outline options once stability is restored. Nothing is assumed upfront.
How do you handle AI-generated code specifically? +
We focus on where AI accelerates risk: authentication logic, data handling, access boundaries, and unreviewed paths.
Which frameworks does this align with? +
SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and EU regulatory expectations. The goal is defensibility, not checkbox compliance.
Do you offer ongoing support? +
Yes โ€” for teams that decide they don't want to return to reactive fixes.

Ready to remove the uncertainty?

15-minute call. No deck. No diagnosis theater.

We'll assess fit and tell you whether this intervention makes sense.

Schedule the Call

Limited monthly capacity ยท Responses within hours

๐Ÿ”’ SOC 2 Type II โœ“ ISO 27001 ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ GDPR-aligned